Jun 12, 2017 | By Tess
Designers from the 3M Buckley Innovation Centre (3M BIC) in Huddersfield, England have 3D printed two life-sized skulls based on a fellow colleague’s MRI scan. The 3D printed skulls were made using SLS and FDM 3D printing technologies and are meant to demonstrate how additive manufacturing has impacted the medical industry.
3M BIC was established in order to facilitate the connections between business and academia with the goal of business growth and innovation. Its latest project, the 3D printed skulls, challenged its in-house designers to use 3D design software and printing to repair a damaged skull.
The skull model was based on an MRI taken of a 3M BIC worker, with the design team saying it used a free software called OsiriX to convert the MRI scans raw data into a 3D model of the skull. For the model, the designers focused on the skull’s bone density.
With the 3D model in front of them, the designers went ahead and designed implants to correct or even out inconsistencies on the digital skull’s surface. This was achieved using a combination of ZBrush and 3DS Max, the latter of which was used to model the implants, while ZBrush was used to integrate them into the original skull model.
“Our Skull project is not only a great showcase for 3D printing, but also underlines how 3D design can be incorporated into the medical industry,” said Dr Michael Wilson. “If doctors can view MRI scan data more freely in 3D it would give them a greater understanding of a patient’s condition and refine the process of reconstructive surgery.”
“If someone fractures their skull, for example, then an MRI scan can be used and translated into 3D. A copy of the undamaged side of the skull can be printed in titanium and then attached to repair the damage caused in the patient’s skull.”
With the 3D model of the skull ready to go, the 3M BIC team 3D printed two versions of the cranial structure. The first was 3D printed using a selective laser sintering (SLS) system (the EOS p110), which uses a laser to sinter layers of nylon-based powder. The second skull was made using an FDM 3D printer (specifically, MakerBot’s latest generation of printer) and was made from PLA.
As makers can imagine, the SLS version of the skull was of a higher quality than the FDM one, with higher degree of detail. The 3M BIC team did say, however, that the FDM 3D printed skull, which took more than 50 hours to print, “highlights the advancement and future possibilities of FDM printers.”
While the skulls were printed by 3M BIC to showcase 3D technologies within the medical field, additive manufacturing is of course already being used around the globe to advance and improve on implants and other medical devices.
The design team says it is currently investigating other MRI scans for potential 3D printing projects, including the shoulder and wrist of a retired rugby player. The 3D model of the skull, for its part, has also been converted for use in virtual reality applications.
Posted in 3D Printing Application
Maybe you also like:
- T-Bone Cape motion control board launches on Indiegogo
- New extruder could lower costs of 3D printing cellular structures for drug testing
- New Ninja Printer Plate for consumer 3D printing
- mUVe3D releases improved Marlin firmware for all 3D printers
- Zecotek plans HD 3D display for 3D printers
- Add a smart LCD controller to your Robo3D printer
- Maker Kase: a handy cabinet for 3D printers
- Heated bed for ABS printing with the Printrbot Simple XL
- Next gen all metal 3D printer extruder from Micron
- Pico all-metal hotend 100% funded in 48 hours, B3 announces Stretch Goal
- Create it REAL announces first 3D printing Real Time Processor
- A larger and more powerful 3D printer extruder on Kickstarter
You are comparing a $2,000 Makerbot printer to a $200,000 EOS. Not really apples to apples comparison. Speed gets increased when you go to the better Stratasys FDM printers.
Nikita wrote at 6/14/2017 9:01:06 AM:
It's more like a CT scan than an MRI scan.
All Things 3D wrote at 6/14/2017 7:29:38 AM:
OsiriX is not a free program ($699) as stated in the article and it also only available for the Mac